Double check:1) APA FORMAT THROUGHOUT!2) It has a title page, abstract, introduction, method

Double check: 1) APA FORMAT THROUGHOUT! 2) It has a title page, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, references, appendix (with figures) 3) Make sure its at least 15 pages (not including your references, abstract, title page, or appendix 4) That\\\\\\\'s all.... Rubric Final Paper Rubric Final Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImprovement from previous draft 7 pts Sections of the manuscript were improved upon and comments from professor and peer reviewers were integrated in a comprehensive and clear manner. 5 pts Most sections were improved upon. 3 pts Some sections were improved upon. 1 pts Comments and edits were mostly ignored. 0 pts No updates made to previous drafts of manuscript. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro: Organization and Structural Development of the Idea 9 pts The research problem and its importance are identified. Hypothesis is clearly justified based on presentation of current research. Current research is presented in a logical way and moves from the bigger picture to the specific study. The writing flows well and allows for easy reading 7 pts The research problem and its importance are identified. Hypothesis is clearly justified based on presentation of current research. Current research is present. 5 pts The research problem and its importance are identified. Hypothesis is somewhat justified based on presentation of current research. Current research is touched on. 3 pts The research problem and its importance are identified. Hypothesis may not be entirely clear. Research is present but lacking. 0 pts Very little research or justification is provided. 9 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro: Content 7 pts The opening sentence is about how, what, or why people think, feel, or act as they do in your own words. Patterned after replication study, but does not duplicate or paraphrase. Five to ten sources are used. Original ideas and thought are readily apparent. 5 pts The opening sentence is about how, what, or why people think, feel, or act as they do in your own words. Patterned after replication study, but does not duplicate or paraphrase. At least five sources are used. 3 pts The opening sentence is about how, what, or why people think, feel, or act as they do in your own words. Patterned after replication study, but some parts appear duplicated or paraphrased. At least five sources are used. 1 pts The opening sentence is about how, what, or why people think, feel, or act as they do in your own words. Patterned after replication study, but some parts appear duplicated or paraphrased. Less than five sources are used. 0 pts Much of the content is duplicated or paraphrased from original study. Not enough sources. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro: Hypothesis 7 pts Hypothesis is clearly stated, with a clear direction and cause. Independent and dependent variables are easily apparent. 5 pts Hypothesis is clearly stated, with a clear direction and cause. 3 pts Hypothesis is stated. 1 pts Hypothesis is not easily identified or apparent. 0 pts No hypothesis is present. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods: Organization and Content 7 pts Subheadings are flush with the left margin and boldface. Writer’s own words are used throughout. 5 pts Subheadings are present and properly used. 3 pts Key subheadings present, but not properly used.. Wording too closely mirrors other projects at points where writer’s own words could be used. 1 pts Key subheadings are absent or not properly used. 0 pts No subheadings present. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods: Participants 7 pts The participants are clearly described. Gender, age, race, and other important distinctions are accounted for. Recruitment strategy is clearly stated. 5 pts The participants are clearly described. Recruitment strategy is clearly stated. 3 pts The participants are clearly described. 1 pts Key descriptors of participants are missing. 0 pts Participants are not clearly discussed. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods: Procedure 7 pts Any special apparatuses or design elements are described. Each step of the study is described, including how participants were assigned to each condition. Operational definitions of independent variables provided. Sample stimuli included or described. Dependent measures are described and operationalized. Steps are described and outlined in a logical, step-by-step fashion. 5 pts Each step of the study is described, including how participants were assigned to each condition. Operational definitions of independent variables provided. Sample stimuli included or described. Dependent measures are described and operationalized. Steps are described and outlined in a logical, step-by-step fashion. 3 pts Each step of the study is described, including how participants were assigned to each condition. Operational definitions of independent variables provided. Dependent measures are described and operationalized. Steps are described and outlined in a logical, step-by-step fashion. 1 pts Each step of the study is described, including how participants were assigned to each condition. Operational definitions of independent variables provided. Dependent measures are described and operationalized. 0 pts Each step of the study is described, but lacks important information. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults: Statistical Tests 7 pts The appropriate statistical tests were conducted. When needed, appropriate follow-up analyses were run. Output is clear and easy to follow. 5 pts The appropriate statistical tests were conducted. When needed, appropriate follow-up analyses were run. Output is clear, but not always easy to follow. 3 pts The appropriate statistical tests were conducted. Output is clear, but not always easy to follow. 1 pts Statistical tests were conducted. Output is clear, but not always easy to follow. 0 pts Output not present or incomplete. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults: Content 7 pts Data is reported in an objective and accurate manner. Results were interpreted only to the point of clarifying what the statistical analyses said about the hypothesis. All further information was left for discussion. Individuals without prior knowledge could read the results section and be able to tell what the hypothesis was and whether it was supported. 5 pts Data is reported in an objective and accurate manner. Results were mostly interpreted only to the point of clarifying what the statistical analyses said about the hypothesis. Individuals without prior knowledge could read the results section and be able to guess what the hypothesis was and whether it was supported. 3 pts Data is reported in an objective and accurate manner. Results were mostly interpreted only to the point of clarifying what the statistical analyses said about the hypothesis. 1 pts Data is reported in an objective and accurate manner. Results were mostly interpreted only to the point of clarifying what the statistical analyses said about the hypothesis. Some statements were more appropriate for the discussion section. 0 pts Biased language was used. Inappropriate conclusions were drawn. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults: Format & Appendices 7 pts Findings are clear and introduced to the reader in a direct and logical manner. Summary statistics were used appropriately for relevant groups. Pattern of data was easy to detect. Appendices, such as tables and figures helped to clarify the data. Each figure had an informative heading. All X and Y axes were correctly labeled. 5 pts Findings are clear and introduced to the reader in a direct and logical manner. Summary statistics were used appropriately for relevant groups. Pattern of data was easy to detect. Appendices, such as tables and figures were present. 3 pts Findings introduced data to the reader in a logical manner. Summary statistics were used appropriately for relevant groups. 1 pts Findings reported, but important information was left out. Summary statistics were used appropriately for relevant groups. 0 pts Findings were unclear or incomplete. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Discussion of Hypothesis 7 pts The hypotheses were fully addressed. It was clear which hypotheses were supported and which were not. The implications of the findings in relation to a priori hypotheses were also discussed. The interpretation of the findings was accurate and representative of the study conducted. 5 pts It was clear which hypotheses were supported and which were not. The implications of the findings in relation to a priori hypotheses were also discussed. The interpretation of the findings was mostly accurate and representative of the study conducted. 3 pts It was mostly clear which hypotheses were supported and which were not. The interpretation of the findings was mostly accurate and representative of the study conducted. 1 pts It was not clear which hypotheses were supported and which were not. The interpretation of the findings was somewhat accurate and representative of the study conducted. 0 pts Biased language was used. Inappropriate conclusions were drawn. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Alternatives and Conclusions 7 pts Alternative explanations were considered and presented. The alternatives were reasonable and demonstrated a higher level of insight and creativity. Conclusion tied the pieces of the study together well and in a comprehensive manner. 5 pts Alternative explanations were considered and presented. The alternatives were reasonable. Conclusion was present. 3 pts Alternative explanations were considered and presented. Conclusion was present. 1 pts Alternative explanations were briefly considered and presented. Conclusion was somewhat present. 0 pts Alternatives and conclusions were unclear or incomplete. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Future Directions 7 pts Future directions were clear and well thought out. They go beyond the obvious possibilities and indicate depth of thought and consideration. A comprehensive list of possibilities was provided. 5 pts Future directions were clear and well thought out. Thoughtfulness was evident in outlined possibilities. Some originality in thought was evident. 3 pts Future directions were listed, but without much consideration. Only obvious findings were outlined. 1 pts Future directions were mentioned, but only briefly. 0 pts Future directions were not present or incomplete. 7 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Mechanics 7 pts Document uses 1” margins, 12 pt Garamond font, and was double spaced. Proper APA formatting used. No errors were present. Paper is 15-20 pages excluding references and appendices. 5 pts Document uses 1” margins, 12 pt Garamond font, and was double spaced. Proper APA formatting mostly used. Some minimal formatting errors present.Paper is 15-20 pages excluding references and appendices. 3 pts Document uses 1” margins, 12 pt Garamond font, and was double spaced. Proper APA formatting used, but not consistently. Formatting errors present. Paper is 13-15 pages excluding references and appendices. 1 pts Incorrect margins, spacing, or font used. Proper APA formatting used. Formatting errors present. Papers is between 10-13 pages excluding references and appendices. 0 pts Incorrect margins, spacing, or font used. Improper APA formatting used. Formatting errors present or the paper does not exceed 10 pages excluding references and appendices. 7 pts Total Points: 100